skip to content
 

Events for...

M T W T F S S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
 
Wednesday, 17 October 2018 - 5.15pm
Location: 
Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, Finley Library

Lecture summary: It is rare for studies on the era of decolonization to present a colonial power as champion of the concept of self-determination. Most of the time, colonial powers were not eager, to put it mildly, to accept the ‘blessing of a people freed’ (as a senior British administrator in the Sudan described it). Indeed, some former colonial powers have relied on this reluctance to argue that they were, in terms of international law, ‘persistent objectors’ to the customary norm of self-determination, and are therefore not bound by it. In a recent arbitration between Mauritius and the United Kingdom, the latter argued that it ‘consistently, throughout the 1950s and the 1960s, objected to references to a “right” of self-determination’, and that self-determination as enshrined in the UN Charter did not have any concrete legal meaning before the 1970s. However, as the quote above illustrates, the British history in the Sudan reveals a different, more curious and more nuanced story of British attitudes towards self-determination. When Egypt—a country that had experienced British colonial rule—sought to absorb the Sudan on the ground of titular sovereignty, Great Britain invoked self-determination as a legal right of the Sudanese. Relying extensively on primary sources, this article shows, contrary to the dominant narrative, that the UN Charter’s references to self-determination were imbued with legal meaning soon after its adoption. Moreover, whereas the legal literature on self-determination largely concentrates on the texts and circumstances of the classic UN General Assembly resolutions of 1960 and 1970, this article shows how diplomatic and administrative exchanges within one government changed, in a specific case, that government’s attitude towards self-determination, transforming it from a political principle to a legal entitlement. This internal process culminated in the UK invoking self-determination before the UN Security Council, and with success. The article therefore tells two closely intertwined stories: one of the internal dynamics leading to the formation of a state’s foreign policy, and one of the subsequent efforts of that state externally to objectify its understanding of self-determination by using the language of law, thereby translating it to a precise legal entitlement.

Dr Sarah Nouwen is a University Senior Lecturer and Co-Deputy Director of the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law & Orfeas Chasapis-Tassinis PhD Law Candidate.

 

Lecture: 17:15 hrs - 18:30 hrs

 

This session is part of the Legal Histories beyond the State work-in-progress seminar series.

Events