skip to content
 
Read more at: Friday Lecture: 'Navigating the Interplay of the Innocent Passage Regime with Human Rights Law and Transnational Criminal Law' - Prof Anna Petrig, University of Basel

Friday Lecture: 'Navigating the Interplay of the Innocent Passage Regime with Human Rights Law and Transnational Criminal Law' - Prof Anna Petrig, University of Basel

There is a sandwich lunch at 12.30 pm in the Old Library at the Centre. All lecture attendees welcome. Lecture summary: The innocent passage regime reflects a delicate balance between the interests of coastal States in asserting jurisdiction over the waters adjacent to their coasts and the interests of flag States in unimpeded navigation therein. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) codifies and stabilises this delicate balance. At the same time, its provisions are drafted in a way that allows the concept of innocent passage to adapt to an evolving legal landscape and shifting priorities in ocean governance. One area where both the law and its interpretation have developed significantly—and where a certain momentum for change can be observed in the international community—is the protection of people at sea. Over the past decade, the concept of human rights at sea has gained traction and increasing recognition. At the same time, transnational crime at sea has emerged as a major security concern, highlighting the increasing relevance of transnational criminal law in the maritime context. Moreover, there is growing awareness of the links between the commission of transnational crimes and the violation of the rights of persons on board ships. In light of these developments, it is timely to navigate the interplay of the innocent passage regime with human rights law and transnational criminal law. This lecture will explore two key questions. First, can UNCLOS be interpreted as authorising a coastal State, in certain circumstances, to take action against a foreign-flagged vessel in its territorial sea on the basis that violations of the rights of persons on board render the passage non-innocent? Second, assuming arguendo that UNCLOS does confer such jurisdiction, might international human rights law and/or transnational criminal law even oblige the coastal State to take action in certain cases? Anna Petrig holds the Chair of International Law and Public Law at the University of Basel and is currently Leverhulme Trust Visiting Professor at SOAS University of London. She is the author of several monographs in the fields of the law of the sea, international human rights law, criminal law and general public international law. Anna has been a member of the Swiss delegation and the delegation of the Comité Maritime International (CMI) to the International Maritime Organization (IMO). She was sitting as Judge ad hoc for Switzerland on the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in Cases 27 and 29. Anna is currently acting as a board member of the Swiss Maritime Law Association and the Swiss Society for International Law and is a member of the scientific board of the Swiss Society for Military Law and the Law of War. She is Co-Rapporteur of the International Law Association (ILA) Committee on Protection of People at Sea and Chair of the EU-funded project BlueRights - Life, Liberty and Health: Ensuring Universal Protection of Human Rights at Sea (COST Action CA23103). The Friday Lunchtime Lecture series is kindly supported by Cambridge University Press & Assessment .


Read more at: Event: 'In Conversation with Prof Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah and Prof Antony Anghie'

Event: 'In Conversation with Prof Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah and Prof Antony Anghie'

5 pm – 6 pm, Tuesday 6 May 2025 Followed by a drinks reception in the Old Library Professor Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah's pioneering scholarship, produced over more than four decades and ranging from human rights to the theory of international law to arbitration and foreign investment law, has made invaluable contributions...


Read more at: Joint Event: 'The Juridification of Justice'

Joint Event: 'The Juridification of Justice'

This is a two-day in-person event. It is open to the public but pre-registration is required. Tuesday 29 April 10am-5pm and Wednesday 30 April 9am-4pm. Convenors Tor Krever (University of Cambridge) Nora Jaber (University of Edinburgh) Speakers Zoe Adams (University of Cambridge) Michael Becker (Trinity College Dublin) Michelle Burgis-Kastallho (University of Edinburgh) Tanzil Chowdhury (Queen Mary University of London) Noura Erakat (Rutgers University) Anastasiya Kotova (Lund University) Carl Emilio Lewis (T.M.C. Asser Institute) Robert Knox (University of Liverpool) Sumi Madhok (LSE) Matilde Masetti Placci (University of Edinburgh) Lara Montesinos Coleman (University of Sussex) Mireia Garces De Marcilla Muste (University of Exeter) Nicola Palmer (University of Cape Town) Nicola Perugini (University of Edinburgh) Marius Pieterse (University of the Witwatersrand) Francisco-José Quintana (Geneva Graduate Institute and European University Institute) Fernando Quintana (Queen Mary University of London) Francisco-José Quintana (Geneva Graduate Institute and European University Institute) Juliana Santos de Carvalho (University of Cambridge) Fionn Toland (University of York) Leila Ulrich (University of Oxford) Dimitri Van Den Meerssche (Queen Mary University of London) Marina Veličković (University of Warwick) Description Calls for justice are increasingly articulated in the language of human rights and legality, injustice framed in turn as an issue of illegality. The crystalisation of legality as the vernacular of justice movements can be seen at both the domestic and international level— the proliferation of ‘rights talk’ and turn to litigation by social movements in national courts; global injustice challenged in the language of international law and international justice increasingly synonymous with international criminal justice. Courts and international legal fora are increasingly the privileged sites in which political demands are articulated and battles over rights and legality are fought and settled. The connection between political demands for justice and their articulation in and through the language of rights and legality is often taken for granted. These developments have received only limited scrutiny, their domestic and international dimensions rarely analysed as part of the same phenomenon. Nor has the historical specificity of these developments received sufficient attention. This symposium brings together scholars to reflect on the potentials, limitations, and dangers of the juridification of struggles for justice. It questions and explores the relationship between conceptions of justice and law in diverse contexts and across time. How and to what extent do contemporary justice struggles differ from their antecedents’ uses of law? What is gained—but also potentially lost—through the juridification of political demands for justice? Under what circumstances can (and have) rights/legality be(en) mobilised in pursuit of justice? When might such framing weaken or depoliticise such demands, potentially collapsing conceptions of justice into mere calls for legal remedies? Speakers will bring specific examples from their own work to consider local and international aspects of the juridification of justice. Collectively, we will assess how these historical and contemporary case studies can best inform new strategies of social transformation and to evaluate the uses and limits of rights/legality within such strategies. There will be a sandwich lunch provided on both days. All registered attendees welcome. This event is supported by: CRASSH The Lauterpacht Centre for International Law Girton College, Cambridge (Sheila Lesley Law and Innovation Grant)


Read more at: Friday Lecture: 'After the Fall: the WTO Appellate Body and the Fragility of International Adjudication' - Dr Henry Lovat, University of Glasgow

Friday Lecture: 'After the Fall: the WTO Appellate Body and the Fragility of International Adjudication' - Dr Henry Lovat, University of Glasgow

In 2019 the World Trade Organization Appellate Body - the institution's 'apex court' - collapsed under US pressure. Since then efforts have been ongoing to reform the dispute settlement system, with the most recent (missed) target to have a functioning system in place by the end of 2024. This talk examines these efforts to reform WTO dispute settlement through a combined International Law/International Relations lens. The analysis suggests that rejudicializing dispute settlement "after the fall" - which remains the notional aim of the vast majority of the WTO membership - is a highly challenging prospect given institutional and intertwined political and legal constraints. These challenges do not stem solely from US obstructionism, moreover, but rather also reflect wider developments in international politics and governance. In broader perspective, the analysis underlines the fragility of international judicial institutions and in turn highlights associated risks to the 'rules-based international order'. Henry Lovat is a Senior Lecturer in International Law and Politics within the School of Law at the University of Glasgow.


Read more at: Friday Lecture: 'Rubber boats: Transnational legal encounters in the Mediterranean' - Prof Tanja Aalberts, VU Amsterdam

Friday Lecture: 'Rubber boats: Transnational legal encounters in the Mediterranean' - Prof Tanja Aalberts, VU Amsterdam

In the mare liberum , seafarers are protected by the age-old maritime duty to rescue anyone in distress at sea. This principle has also been codified in various treaties, including the 1974 Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Convention. This convention was adopted in response to the Titanic disaster and mainly focuses on safety on board of commercial ships. But the most vulnerable people at sea nowadays clearly are irregular migrants, sailing by rubber boats rather than cruise ships. Formally, these migrants are also protected by the non-refoulement principle under refugee and human rights law. Yet in practice, they are subject to a politics of protection which operates through an intermeshing of different legal regimes. Moreover, the rubber boats play a crucial role in this politics of protection, and ultimately preclude the irregular migrants from the protection of the non-refoulement principle. Through the case of the rubber boat, as a transnational legal encounter of people, rules and objects, I investigate the uneven geographies and temporalities of international law as an everyday practice. Moreover, by paying critical attention to how objects participate in actualising certain sets of relations and potentials over others, the concept of transnational legal encounters enables us to critically re-think the production of meanings, legalities and politics, layering complexities to law’s work in and to the world. Tanja Aalberts is Professor of Law and Politics at the department of Transnational Legal Studies, VU Amsterdam.


Read more at: LCIL Talk: 'Accountability Mechanisms in International Organizations: The World Bank Sanctions System and the Fight against Corruption in International Development' - Felipe Rocha dos Santos

LCIL Talk: 'Accountability Mechanisms in International Organizations: The World Bank Sanctions System and the Fight against Corruption in International Development' - Felipe Rocha dos Santos

In-person event only. Corruption drains public resources, distorts markets, and erodes trust in institutions—but how do international organizations tackle this pervasive challenge? International financial institutions like the World Bank invest billions in development projects each year, but without strong safeguards, these funds can be lost to fraud, bribery, and other forms of misconduct. Ensuring accountability in this context requires more than just financial oversight—it demands a robust legal framework to investigate misconduct and impose sanctions on wrongdoers. To that end, international financial institutions often establish internal mechanisms to uphold integrity standards and deter misuse of funds. The World Bank Group (WBG) Sanctions System is a unique and evolving legal framework that holds companies and individuals accountable for fraud and corruption in development projects worldwide—operating outside national courts but with profound global consequences. This session will offer an in-depth look at this system, exploring key legal questions: What is the basis of the WBG’s jurisdiction? What due process standards apply within an international organization? How do the administrative decisions of an international financial institution interact with national and international legal frameworks and enforcement authorities? Felipe Rocha dos Santos is a Brazilian attorney specializing in international development, regulatory enforcement, and integrity matters. He serves as Senior Counsel to the WBG Sanctions Board, an international administrative tribunal that adjudicates sanctions cases involving fraud and corruption in WBG operations. He also contributes to the Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR), a joint effort by the WBG and the United Nations to combat transnational financial crime. In this capacity, he has led key publications, including a report on asset recovery mechanisms for the G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group. Before joining the WBG, Felipe worked in private practice in Washington, D.C., and Paris, conducting high-profile anti-corruption investigations and compliance audits in Latin America and Africa. He also served in Brazil’s Ministry of Justice, advising on consumer protection policies and regulation and representing Brazil in international negotiations. Felipe holds an LL.B. with highest honors from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and an LL.M. from Harvard Law School. He is licensed to practice law in Brazil, New York, and the District of Columbia, and is a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE).


Read more at: 'On the legal status of maritime spaces and resources: Reflections in the context of the law of the sea' - Dr Konrad Marciniak, ITLOS Judge

'On the legal status of maritime spaces and resources: Reflections in the context of the law of the sea' - Dr Konrad Marciniak, ITLOS Judge

Time: 2 pm - 3 pm This is an in-person event only. Lecture summary: Debates over various types of maritime resources – be it fisheries, offshore gas & oil deposits, mineral resources of the deep sea or marine genetic resources – have formed an integral part of the development of the law of the sea. Arguments have often been put forward focusing on the relationship between the resource in question and the legal status of a given maritime zone. They are formulated in two principal ways: either that the legal status of a given zone should extend to the status of a resource or, conversely, that the status or characteristics of a given resource provide a (legal and/or moral, ethical) rationale for the legal status of a maritime zone where the resource in question is found. The lecture will discuss selected types of resources and maritime zones. Dr Konrad Marciniak is a Judge at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS). Previously he worked at the Treaty and Legal Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Poland where he was a senior expert on the law of the sea and environmental law (2007-2014), Deputy Director (Deputy Legal Adviser) (2014-2019) and Director (Legal Adviser) (2019-2023). He was also Assistant Lecturer at the Law Faculty, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw (2006-2016); guest lecturer at: Collegium Civitas University in Warsaw, Polish National School of Public Administration, Polish Diplomatic Academy and ITLOS (Nippon programme) (2007-present); Conciliator under Article 2 of Annex V to the Convention; Arbitrator under Article 2 of Annex VII to the Convention; Arbitrator designated pursuant to Article 2(4) of the Schedule to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty; Vice-President to the Bureau of the BBNJ Intergovernmental Conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Head of the Polish delegation to the EU Working Parties on Public International Law (COJUR; 2019-2023) and on the Law of the Sea (COMAR; 2007-2023) (Chair of the Group in 2011); Head of the Polish delegation to the Council of Europe Committee of Legal Advisors on Public International Law (CAHDI); Co-chair of the Antarctic Working Group of the Polish Intergovernmental Polar Policy Committee. Dr Marciniak was a Visiting Scholar in 2009.


Read more at: LCIL Seminar: East Asian Disputes: the case of Japan and Korea

LCIL Seminar: East Asian Disputes: the case of Japan and Korea

Time: 2pm – 3.30 pm Speakers: Professor Jeehyun Choi , Jeju National University ‘History-related disputes between Korea and Japan from the 20th Century onwards’ Professor Aya Iino , Nihon University ‘WTO trade disputes between Japan and Korea’ Professor Filippo Fontanelli , University of Edinburgh ‘Atypical alternative dispute resolution: attempts to settle the Japan-Korea comfort women dispute’ Commentator: Professor John Nilsson-Wright , University of Cambridge Chair: Mr Stefan McLean , Visiting Scholar, Lauterpacht Centre This is an in-person event.


Read more at: Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures 2025: Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law: Continuing Conversations with Karen Knop

Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures 2025: Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law: Continuing Conversations with Karen Knop

The Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lecture is an annual three-part lecture series given in Cambridge to commemorate the unique contribution to the development of international law of Sir Hersch Lauterpacht. These lectures are given annually by a person of eminence in the field of international law. We will come together to celebrate the life and scholarship of our colleague and friend, Professor Karen Knop (1960-2022). Karen, until her untimely passing, was the Cecil A Wright Chair at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law. A long-time friend of the Lauterpacht Centre, Karen was to have delivered the Centre’s 2025 Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures. The 2025 Lectures will take place on 13 and 14 March, over four special sessions, conversing with Karen’s extraordinary body of work across the history and theory of international law, gender and feminism studies, and private and foreign relations law. Four former HLM Lecturers will deliver these lectures in conversation with three discussants, all outstanding scholars mentored by Karen. Registration for 13 March Registration for 14 March Online registration for 13 March Online registration for 14 March


Read more at: Evening event: 'The Rule of Law under Challenge: The Enmeshment of National and International Trends' - Gregory Shaffer, Georgetown University Law Center

Evening event: 'The Rule of Law under Challenge: The Enmeshment of National and International Trends' - Gregory Shaffer, Georgetown University Law Center

In-person event only. Lecture summary: The goal of the rule of law is to protect individuals from the arbitrary exercise of power. Democracy and human rights depend on the rule of law. But today the rule of law is under growing threat in the United States and around the world. Trends regarding rule-of-law protections are transnational in scope. They involve shifting norms, institutions, and practices at the local, national, and international levels. This talk will assess how challenges are taking place at the international and national levels, and how these challenges are linked. It examines the ways in which international law and institutions are important for rule-of-law ends, as well as their pathologies, since power also is exercised beyond the state in an interconnected world. The rule of law is the result of persistent, hard fought struggles over time. Sustaining the rule of law is a never-ending struggle, one that current challenges make particularly daunting. Gregory Shaffer is Scott K. Ginsburg Professor of International Law at Georgetown University Law Center and is the immediate past President of the American Society of International Law. He has served as a member of the Board of Editors of the American Journal of International Law and the Journal of International Economic Law, among a dozen others. He received his JD from Stanford Law School, his BA from Dartmouth College, and practiced law in Paris with Coudert Brothers and Bredin Prat for over seven years. His publications include twelve books and over one hundred articles and book chapters, including The Rule of Law under Pressure: A Transnational Challenge (with Sandholtz, CUP); His book Emerging Powers and the World Trade System: The Past and Future of International Economic Law won the 2022 Chadwick F. Alger Prize of the International Studies Association for the best book on international organizations. Chair: Prof Sandesh Sivakumaran , Centre Director